Search
Login
Register

Teachers should know their rights

Wed., January 10, 2001

Every year, tens of thousands of Michigan public school teachers are forced to surrender a substantial portion of their paychecks to the Michigan Education Association (MEA) and its parent union, the National Education Association (NEA). Some of this money goes to legitimate employee representation duties, including contract negotiation and grievance processing. But a large amount of members' dues dollars is spent on union lobbying, political campaigns, and the promotion of controversial social causes.

What can teachers do if they disagree with the NEA and MEA's moral, political, and social agendasor if they just want to keep more of their own money?

Fortunately for such public school employees, there are legal rights available to them in these compulsory union situations. Many are unaware of these rights because union leaders all too often fail to notify members of their legal options. But these rights, established by U.S. Supreme Court decisions, are the law of the land regardless of what a collective bargaining agreement says or what individual teachers might otherwise be told.

All teachers and other public school employees have the right to:

· Join or not join a workplace union. Membership in a union is optional, and teachers cannot legally be compelled to join at any time.

· Resign membership in a union. Some unions, like the MEA, attempt to place restrictions on how and when they will accept member resignations. This practice has been declared illegal by the Michigan Employment Relations Commission in a recent case involving an MEA member. Consequently, union members in similar situations may be able to resign at any time.

· Eliminate financial support for a workplace union's non-representation activities. Teachers who refuse to join their workplace union or who resign their membership are legally obligated to pay only those dues or fees necessary to cover the expenses of essential union representation duties such as collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance processing. All other portions of union dues, including those that go to political, social, and ideological causes, are not legally chargeable to nonunion teachers who object to funding these activities.

· Receive a full explanation of any and all fees charged by a workplace union. Public-sector unions must provide nonmember employees with an explanation of any fees charged, an independent accountant's verification of the fees, and an explanation of the procedures under which the nonunion employees can challenge the union fees before a neutral third party.

· Challenge a workplace union's fee assessments. Nonunion employees have the right to challenge the amount their union charges them before an impartial decision-maker, to receive proper notice and information of this right, and to have the disputed fees escrowed until the challenge is resolved.

How do teachers or other public school employees exercise these rights? First, they must resign their union membership and state their objections to funding superfluous union activities in writing. The union is then required to explain what an employee must continue to pay for its representation services only, and how it calculated this amount. Employees have a period of time in which they can reconsider and continue to pay full union dues, or resign to take advantage of the reduced union fee.

Teachers and other public school employees should of course weigh carefully their decision to join or remain in a union, as there are distinct advantages and disadvantages to either choice. As nonmembers, employees pay a reduced fee, are not subject to union discipline or fines, and are legally entitled to the same representation services as union members. Likewise, nonmembers enjoy all of the benefits of the union's collective bargaining agreement with the employer. Nonmembers may, however, be denied member rights including the ability to attend union meetings; ratify or reject collective bargaining agreements; vote in union elections, and receive any financial benefits provided by the union, such as a union credit card, discounted auto insurance rates, and so on.

But even as nonunion members, employees still enjoy workplace protections under Michigan's Public Employee Relations Act (PERA) without joining a union. The law protects employees who engage in lawful concerted activities with other employees for the purposes of collective negotiation, bargaining, or other mutual aid and protection, even if no union represents the employees.

As we enter a new century, it is important to recognize that the confrontational 19th-century factory model of labor relations—with its legalized compulsion funded by forced dues—is not necessarily the best model for our schools. After all, schools are not factories, teachers are not assembly line workers, and students are not widgets. The current rigid and standardized approach to employee representation only discourages innovation and creativity at a time when citizens and teachers are struggling to find solutions to improve education for all Michigan children.

Educators are professionals and should expect to be treated as such. Perhaps when more teachers and other public school employees take advantage of their rights, unions will be more inclined to abandon their old ways and embrace professionalism instead of molding teachers into rank-and-file factory workers.

For more information on public school employees' rights, visit www.mackinac.org.

Michigan Education Daily
"Comcast has announced it is expanding eligibility for “Internet Essentials,” a program that provides Internet access to the households of disadvantaged students ..." >>
"Grand Valley State University is extending the application window for new charter public schools ..." >>
"Muskegon Heights will save about $1.2 million this year and next after privatizing clerical workers, custodians and bus drivers ..." >>
"Secretaries in Niles Community Schools have agreed to a new contract that includes a 2.5 percent pay cut ..." >>
"The Saline Board of Education will wait for the state Legislature to act before going ahead with a proposal to require students to recite the Pledge of Allegiance daily ..." >>
"Some Central Michigan University Faculty Association members are suspicious of their union’s voting process ..." >>
"Gov. Rick Snyder joined 25 other governors in recognizing the week of January 22-28 as 'School Choice Week' ..." >>
User Comments
Since 2009, the EFM was allocated $500.5 million in stimulus funds. They tore down a High School and built a multi-million dollar Cass Tech, the structure alone costing $94 million. $45 million was spent for a safety program. $41 million was used to purchase a reading series not needed, $50 million was used to buy all new computers for staff and students. $1.6 million was used for administrative travel and all leadership positions recieved significant raises. The EFM in the first year gave himself a $86,000 raise, including resources from philanthropist contributions, his salalry was somewhere beyond $450,000. This is a leadership who spent more to rent and eventually buy five floors of the Fisher Bldg for office space, paying more than the owner paid for the entire building one year earlier, adorned with rare and expensive artifacts.

Teachers have had pay freezes since 2001, they have had pay cuts, benefit cuts and an additional $500.00 has been deducted from their monothly pay for two years and counting.

Oh the money is in the schools alright, it just doesn't make it to the classroom. >>
except/accept??????? per pupil funding. If you're a teacher, I hope this was a typo. >>
Yes, I am agree with you. Educational equity argument can help, But also cause blowback credits are more popular than vouchers.

Thanks
_______
Daniel

<a href=“http://www.legalx.net” rel=“dofollow”>Find Attorney</a> >>
Yes, I am agree with you. Educational equity argument can help, But also cause blowback credits are more popular than vouchers.

Thanks
_______
Daniel

<a href=“http://www.legalx.net”>Find Attorney</a> >>
Your comment "No one is that poor that they cant provide a boloney sandwich..." was the definition of "out-of-touch". First, I agree whole-heartedly that parents matter. I would love to see parents drive or car pool kids to school. Even provide them with food, too. However, sadly it is unrealistic. The economy is so weak that everything is shrinking. If we eliminate transportation and food for students we may find many families electing not to send the child to school at all...then what?

Please respond! >>
This agreement has saved the districts money yet we are chastised for it despite the fact the wording at issue was known to be invalid and unenforceable by either side. I applaud our effort and believe this suit is frivolous. http://www.godfrey-lee.org/education/components/board/default.php?sectiondetailid=3458&threadid=554 >>
education is an all around development for a child
he should be mentally and physically strong


<a href="http://rescueyoursavings.com" rel="dofollow">Savings</a> >>
education is an all around development for a child
he should be mentally and physically strong >>
Informative post. In order to deal with today's troubled youth, it is helpful to take a professional guidance for better teen recovery programs. Choosing a specialized organization for troubled youth is one of the most important steps for better teen recovery. Boysville is one of the non profit organization dedicated to help troubled youth with years of successful results by helping <a href=http://www.troubledteensguide.com/>troubled youth</a> to responsible individuals. Hope this organization continue their priceless support to most of the needy troubled youth with various helpful services. >>
Public servants like Presidents, Vice-Presidents, Senators, Congressmen, Judges, Secretaries of Various Departments and the like should be first to be compensated for performance.
The idea that the playing field for students is level everywhere is as Quixotic as thinking all politicians are honest and competent.
There are neighborhoods where only Portugese or gang sign language is spoken, where the parents both work two jobs to pay rent, where getting to school and back is more dangerous than Iraq and Afghanastan.
This Secretary of Education has to remove the silver spoon, roll up his sleeves and take his superior intellect attitude into the trenches and show the poor slobs that are taking their teachers jobs for granted how he would do it. Just because his mommy used to help out in Chicago doesn't give him the Congression Medal of Honor. Actually he's a stuffed shirt pretending to know it all.
How much do you want to bet that he wouldn't attempt entering these neighborhoods let alone these schools without security. >>