Search
Login
Register

A charter challenge: Finding an affordable building can be a hurdle

Financial markets showing interest in academies with track record

Wed., August 15, 2007

Finding and financing a school building continue to be among the main challenges facing new charter public schools in Michigan, but experts say those with a proven track record are now attracting interest from financial investors.

Sabis Educational Services has signed a purchase agreement to buy the former Kaufman Elementary School building and grounds, shown here, from Bridgeport-Spaulding Community Schools. Sabis plans to open the International Academy of Saginaw, a public charter school, at the site.

Locating a place for a new charter school is difficult because of the expense and the building requirements. Conventional public school districts may levy a tax to raise money for new buildings or renovations; charter schools cannot. Instead, charters use part of the per-pupil aid they receive from the state, or privately raised funds, to pay for facilities.

While some charter start-ups are backed by management companies that pay for buildings up front, many new charters can’t afford to build or purchase a building immediately, and lenders are less likely to provide money to a school that has yet to prove itself. Even if the seed money is in place, not all buildings are suitable for use as schools, and some conventional public school districts have said they will not sell or lease their unused buildings to charter operators.

The cumulative effect is that charters call a wide range of facilities "home" as they look for affordable and suitable spots, according to a report issued jointly by the Michigan Council of Charter School Authorizers and Charter FS Corp., a financial consulting firm.

"Charter public schools … rely on innovative facilities arrangements and financing options to secure safe, secure learning environments for their children," the report states.

Charters are found in storefronts, modular facilities, former industrial buildings and former private or parochial schools, according to Christine Smiggen, vice president of Charter FS. Many of them open under lease-to-own agreements that let the school build a track record it can show to investors when it’s time to purchase the building.

"New charter schools really need to start in a leased facility," Smiggen said. "They can’t build. It’s really hard for them to borrow up front like that."

"Our experience is that new charter schools can’t build their own building. … They have no financial track record, no credit. They almost have to rent," agreed John Romine, president of The Romine Group, an education service provider. The company currently manages five charter schools in Michigan, but has worked with 18 schools over the years and helped a dozen of those find facilities.

Smiggen and Romine both said that charters that stay the course — those whose contracts are renewed by their respective authorizers and show stable enrollment — are beginning to attract financial investors who see the schools as a viable investment.

The U.S. Department of Education has also entered the scene, recently announcing a $6.5 million grant for the Michigan Public Educational Facilities Authority through the federal Credit Enhancement for Charter Schools Facilities program. The grants are designed to help charter schools increase credit worthiness and help them obtain facilities funding.

"Charter schools are one of the fastest-growing sources of school choice in American education today, but many can’t obtain financing for the facilities they need to house their schools," Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings said in announcing the grant. "These grants will help communities open up new spaces to charter schools so that, in turn, these schools can open their doors to new students."

In some of the state’s largest urban areas, charter organizers can’t look to conventional public school districts for school sites. Even though a number of districts have buildings for sale (See ‘School for sale,’ this issue), at least two large districts have said publicly that they will not sell or lease their buildings to a charter organization or to a third party acting on behalf of a charter.

Detroit Public Schools plans to close more than 30 buildings this year and next, but the Detroit Free Press reported that the board of education adopted a resolution not to make the buildings available to charter operators. The Lansing School District, which has put eight vacant school buildings on the market since spring of 2006, said it would not sell one of its empty elementary schools to the Mid-Michigan Leadership Academy, a charter school that was renting space at the nearby state-owned Michigan School for the Blind.

Lansing Board of Education member Hugh Clarke Jr. was asked by local media about selling property to a charter operation. He was quoted as saying, "From an ideological standpoint, it might be difficult for me to swallow. … That’s almost like cutting off your nose to spite your face."

The Academy later purchased about eight acres at the School for the Blind site from the state.

The Michigan School Code states that school boards and intermediate school boards "shall not impose any deed restriction prohibiting, or otherwise prohibit, property sold or transferred by the school board … from being used for any lawful public education purpose" without advance approval of the State Board of Education. Further, "the school board or intermediate board shall not refuse to lease or rent the property to a person solely because the person intends to use the property for an educational purpose, if the intent of the person is to use the property for a lawful educational purpose."

"It’s been the law for 11 years, but people know how to get around it," said Leonard Wolfe, an attorney who helped develop the language. Wolfe, a former Michigan Senate staffer and clerk in the executive branch’s legal division under former Gov. John Engler, is now an attorney in Lansing. The law doesn’t require conventional school districts to sell their property to charters, he said, but is supposed to prevent them from putting advance restrictions on such sales.

"It’s been a horrible situation," Romine said. In one case, he said, a conventional public district put a building up for sale, then took it off the market after a charter school showed interest.

"They took the for-sale sign down," he said, until the charter organizers found a different site.

In general, new charter operators like to buy existing schools because they require less renovation to meet school code requirements and are located in residential neighborhoods. But Sabis Educational Systems Inc., an international company with 31 private and charter schools, has converted various types of buildings to educational facilities, according to Jose Afonso, director of the board and governmental affairs.

In one case, Sabis converted a former department store to a school by installing skylights and a large central courtyard and rimming the courtyard with classrooms, Afonso said. He believes that could be a model for other schools.

"It was so cheap for us to do that," he said. The facility now houses 700 students and cost $12 million to purchase and renovate.

As an exception to most districts refusing to sell to charter operators, Sabis recently signed a purchase agreement to buy a former elementary school from Bridgeport-Spaulding Community Schools for $150,000 as the site for its new International Academy of Saginaw. The school will be the company’s second Michigan site; the first is the International Academy of Flint.

Before bidding on Kaufman Elementary School, Sabis considered putting in a bid on a two-story, 109,000-square-foot site in downtown Saginaw. They dropped the plan because there was no room for parking or a playground, "unless we used the roof, which we thought about," Afonso said.

Afonso, who formerly worked in the Massachusetts Department of Education, believes conventional school districts are shortsighted in declining bids from charter schools and that their time would be better spent improving their own operations.

"Charter schools are here to stay," he said. "This kind of opposition is an awful waste of time and energy and money. Very, very few charters have been stopped by a district’s intransigence on charter schools. Charter schools are created by people who are determined to provide choice. They will find a way."

But conventional school districts have a responsibility to consider the financial impact that selling their property will have on their operation, said William Bowman, president of the Great Northern Consulting Group. Bowman’s firm works with school districts to plan and carry out real estate sales. Bowman said that it doesn’t necessarily make economic sense to sell property to a competitor, whether charter or private.

His company advises schools to put out requests for proposals for the purchase of school property and then determine the "net economic value" of each offer. That includes projecting how many students are likely to leave the conventional school district and attend the new school. Each student who switches schools represents a loss in state aid to the host district, he said.

If a conventional district receives three offers for a building, he said, one from a competing school, one from a project that would have no effect on school enrollment and one that would boost the conventional district’s enrollment, then "purchase price is only one thing they’re going to take into consideration." Royal Oak Public Schools, for example, has sold most of its elementary sites to housing developers.

Bridgeport-Spaulding put Kaufman Elementary on the market as part of a consolidation strategy, Superintendent Desmon Daniel said. In recent years the school had been used for a day care program and as an alternative education site.

"We had some extensive discussions" about selling to a charter operation, he said. The board of education voted 3-2 in May to move ahead with the purchase agreement.

"We have high-quality teachers and we believe our teachers do a more than competent job at educating our stakeholders — the students of this district," he said.

Another group — financial investors — "are finally realizing that charters are here to stay," Romine said. Charter schools that find suitable facilities and that show stable enrollment, fiscal responsibility and the trust of their authorizers are attracting attention in the bond market and from some lending institutions, added Smiggen, of Charter FS.

"There are more players coming into the marketplace," she said. Two years ago, when Charter FS looked for underwriters for academies interested in selling bonds, there was only one active investor, she said. This year, the firm’s latest request for proposals brought in 10 possible buyers.

"That’s a significant difference," she said. "Bankers by nature are risk-averse and nobody wants to be the first one," but now they realize, "Hey, this is a pretty good place to make money."

In Big Rapids, Crossroads Academy got its start by purchasing an empty building from Big Rapids Public Schools, according to former superintendent Dave VanderGoot. The 1928 facility had been used over the years as a high school and a middle school, but was left empty after Big Rapids built a new high school.

Crossroads opened with approximately 330 students in kindergarten through eighth-grade and today has nearly 700 in kindergarten through twelfth-grade. When they outgrew their building, they decided to build a new high school in two phases, VanderGoot said, first building nine classrooms and an office complex and, in the second phase, nine more classrooms and a gymnasium.

"We built by borrowing from a local bank," he said. "They watched our growth. … Suddenly you have people willing to spend on charter schools."

Because they pay for facilities out of their general operating budgets, not sinking funds or debt millage levies, charters look for less-expensive options, Smiggen said. They might build over time, design multi-use rooms or go without media centers or gymnasiums.

In response to a challenge to build a school at half the normal cost, Bouma Construction has developed a model for charter school construction that it says saves money by using standardized products, design and construction methods. According to its Web site, the Grand Rapids-based company has been involved in 35 school construction or renovation projects, with an additional 10 in progress.

"They (charter schools) have got to make that foundation allowance stretch much further," Smiggen said. "They understand that and the parents understand that. I’m always amazed at some of these charter schools that have huge waiting lists and there’s nothing special about the building."

Michigan Education Daily
"Bay County area schools should conduct school board elections jointly with general elections as a way to save money and have more representative voter turnout." >>
"Now three years old, the Kalamazoo Promise has had mixed results in its mission to send Kalamazoo Public Schools graduates to college." >>
"Grand Rapids and Holland public schools are reporting higher numbers of homeless students than last year and expect the figures to grow." >>
"Nineteen Detroit Public Schools teachers are running for election to leadership slots in the Detroit Federation of Teachers union on a school reform platform, according to The Detroit News. The teachers want to open their own charter school modeled after the Los Angeles Green Dot Schools." >>
"Teachers in Gaylord Community Schools have voted to replace the Michigan Educational Special Services Association with AmeraPlan as a third-party insurance administrator, saving the district about 25 percent on health care costs." >>
"A Spanish language teacher quit her job at Michigan Collegiate High School amid allegations that she had a sexual relationship with a 16-year-old male student." >>
"Wyandotte Public Schools is attracting attention statewide for its 90 percent pass rate among algebra II students." >>
User Comments
Testing is not the answer. All it does is give the "teacher" a basis for determining a grade. And, we all know that grading and grades are circumspect. Rather, a more true measure of learning is when the learner (i.e., the "student" using traditional and aniquated terminology and stereotyping) wants to know more about a topic or issue. This expression of desire for more is an affirmation that the learner has mastered current concepts and material and now wants to move on. In this scenario no test nor grade is necessary. What should be necessary is for the provider (i.e., the "teacher") to have the next level or dimension of concepts and materials readily available to present and apply once the learner expresses the desire to move on.

What we need is a system that is designed to cater to this basal learning behavior and can be applied in real time. Take a look at the definitive treatment "Education in America -- What's to Be Done?" developed by Trigon-International. This commission report presents an end-to-end solution that is actionable and affordable. >>
$400 K, try $400 million >>
Thank you to Lorie Shane and Marcie Lipsitt for blowing off the cover, exposing one of Michigan's "dirty secrets."

As the parent of a child with special needs in Michigan, it's been an uphill battle since day one to get the APPROPRIATE services for my child. Sadly, the bar is held too low for our kids. Upon graduating, if the student is not capable of attending college, he/she is warehoused into post-secondary settings where formal academics are not offered. Perhaps if students had gotten proper academics when younger- taught by highly qualified teachers- many would have had the opportunity to move on and continue formal academics like their non-disabled peers, rather than be expected to dust shelves and bag groceries their whole lives.

Michigan's special eduation has and continues to fail our children.

>>
As a parent I see the value of a teacher with knowledge of both special ed methods and the subject matter. Do enough of them exist to go around? My guess is that many teachers who concentrated their schooling and training on special ed took fewer courses in subject matter (English, Mathematics, Science, etc.). There are limits on course load, number of years in college, and student finance.

As much as we want the best for every person, we are not going to have six teachers each an expert in their subject matter per one pupil. So in this world of limited resources, each person and our society have to decide how to use the resources we have. Hopefully a successful balance of flexibility and accountability can produce the desired results: educated children with the capacity to think and the ability to learn. >>
Michigan High School & the University deliver quality education to its
students & has maintained its standard with good caliber. The courses offered by the Michigan institutes are versatile and for future progress of the society and the students, it further enhances them to become excellent citizens!!
---------------------------
Carol
<a href="http://http://www.treatmentcenters.org/michigan">Michigan Treatment Centers</a>
>>
Thank you for your comments. I would be honored and proud to go to any school district or meeting to stand up for your/our children!! Just EMail me and I will be there or call me anytime at 616-8474282
Thank You, Dr Jack Grenan Educator and Cancer Survivor >>
Parents and teachers have not had a voice. The waivers used have allowed administrators of various Michigan schools to plunk in 20 - 25 students in a classroom of students with learning disabilities. As a special education teacher, I find it very difficult to meet the individual learning objectives of that many students. >>
This article presents excellent information. As the parent of a child with a disability I advocate for my son. Currently, there is no one to speak for all the children with disabilities in Michigan. There is no transparency of government. The position of State Superintendent is a dictatorship with the power to make all the decisions. As a parent, I cannot voice my concerns by voting. >>
Ferndale High School in Ferndale, Michigan succeeded in correcting the mistaken reporting of the Johns Hopkins University report that had included it as a "dropout factory" with poor "promoting power." The University researchers have acknowledged that Ferndale High School does not belong in this category and removed the school from the list because of the school district's high outward mobility (more students move out than move in during high school.). The high school has a three-year promoting power ration of 77% rather than the 50% reported in the Associated Press in October 2007, with the Class of 2006 having a 91% promoting power. Please visit Johns Hopkins' website for more clarification to see the "Schools Removed from the List of Weak Promoting Power High Schools: http://web.jhu.edu/CSOS/images/Removed_from_List_5_14_08.pdf .

Also, visit www.ferndaleschools.org for info about the school district. >>
So you're not going to admit an anti-MESSA bias?

*wink* >>